Saturday, July 15, 2023
2021 Capsule Reviews
Saturday, July 1, 2023
The Flash (2023) Review
the rating: ****
the story: Barry Allen attempts to rewrite his own history, and instead breaks the timeline.
the review: It's going to be completely impossible for anything resembling a reasonable popular consensus on the DCEU to exist for years, decades. Its proximity to the height of the MCU created a huge distorting effect in much the way DC and Marvel in the comics have competed for top placement for sixty years. Simply put, their coexistence could not be reconciled by the mere weight of pop culture. The Flash is a last attempt to conclude the DCEU, in the most dramatic way possible, and to my mind a hugely successful one, although it has features that are admittedly hard to appreciate.
Chiefly, its special effects, especially the crucial depiction of the Speed Force, where Barry Allen watches outside regular time the effects of his speedy travels. After the high water mark of Quicksilver's appearances in the X-Men movies, the superpower of speed was always going to be difficult to depict in a truly satisfying way. Actually, The Flash opens with a scene that tops them, improbably saving the lives of a bunch of babies while looking like it's the last thing on his mind. I work with babies. This is the kind of scene that will win easy bonus points for me. Otherwise, Barry looks unreal on his feet, in ways Spider-Man never did slinging through New York City in the Sam Raimi movies that set the new bar for the genre twenty years ago. But it's because, dude's ability is running. This is never going to look awesome. Not if you're forced to depict it.
There's really no way around that. But the story itself is absolutely killer. Geoff Johns first wrote this story in the breakthrough event comic Flashpoint, which has already been adapted twice, once in the Flash TV series (third season) and the animated movie Justice League: The Flashpoint Paradox, which like the comic depicted Barry brutally electrocuting himself with lightning to try and get his speed back. For me this is iconic material. For me, when Barry has to say goodbye to his mom at the end of the film, it means more than Rocket Raccoon, the b-plot in his starring role for Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3, gets some kind of comeuppance. It's earned.
And around that, you've got Barry, the version of Barry Allen that could only exist as portrayed by Ezra Miller, essentially first and foremost essentially starring opposite himself. And then you've also got Michael Keaton returning as Batman. This was heavily promoted in exactly the opposite way as Tobey Maguire and Andrew Garfield showing up in Spider-Man: No Way Home (uh, spoiler?), since you can't hide such a crucial point. In a lot of ways, it's almost the whole point. We're in an age where seeing old stars in old roles is supposed to be the selling point. This isn't even nostalgia but awareness that some franchises were abandoned, or changed, too quickly. Keaton only made two Batman movies, and while one of them isn't as fondly remembered as the other, everyone was always bummed he didn't appear in the other two. It's the same impulse that brought Connery back to Bond, eventually, at least for one more movie (even if it's technically unofficial), forty years ago. This is really nothing new.
The movie climaxes on Barry's fight against himself, a third version who couldn't let go. It's not really the fight with Zod, the deaths of Batman and Supergirl, although this part of the movie is directly addressing the DCEU, the controversial way Man of Steel ended, the "original sin" that needed erasing a decade ago. Most MCU movies only ever have the one kind of ending. Guardians 2 had "Mary Poppins," which is what redeems it for some fans. That's a rare exception. Usually the villain is meant to be the villain, and the hero just needs to defeat them. They don't really learn anything. They just move on to the next one. For a long time, that formula worked, and a DCEU trying a different narrative was cognitive dissonance: "That's not what these kinds of movies should be doing!" They're supposed to be emotionally simplistic. Their ambition is just building to Thanos!
In a lot of ways, the implosion of the DCEU resulted in something far more interesting. The Flash might have been envisioned in its basic shape this way all along, but it has far greater symbolic meaning. You get to see all those digital cameos, and even the official ones, because this is an ending. Its story takes on greater resonance for it. Barry needs to let go, and figure out that it's better that way. Same, The Flash. Same.
Asteroid City (2023) Review
the rating: ****
the story: Young achievers are unexpectedly at the heart of an unlikely alien encounter.
the review: So I've really gotten into Wes Anderson, finally, and predictably it's just when critics have gotten over him. I mean, they've been over him for at least a decade, and I didn't get into him, really, until a few years ago, so it's not that surprising. Of course I had to see Asteroid City. Of course it was likely that I would enjoy it. I expected to like it more, but I definitely liked it. The appearances of Tom Hanks and Steve Carell actually created a kind of uncanny valley, that breaks the typical mold of total control on Anderson's part. Most actors who appear in his films fit the mold perfectly; Hanks can't help but be Hanks, and the same is true of Carell. Everyone else (Owen Wilson is atypically absent, but Jason Schwartzman, another longtime collaborator, is back in a starring role) very much fits in nicely.
"You can't wake up if you don't go to sleep."
That's how the movie ends. This is not a spoiler. Just as Amsterdam ends with each of the principle characters reciting the eponymous city name to the audience, and Cradle Will Rock builds to the climactic moment from the 1937 play it's built around, Asteroid City concludes with the cast of stage actors reciting this line. How much you appreciate the movie is likely tied to how much thought you put into it. The movie preceding it plays out along two separate tracks: one is a presentation of a play, and the other as if the play were happening in reality and not on a stage. Schwartzman's character pulls himself out of the play when he struggles to understand why his character chooses to burn his hand on a grill, and so clearly Anderson's intent is for his audience to figure out his intent, too.
"You can't wake up if you don't go to sleep." There will be plenty of speculation about it for those interested, and so maybe this review isn't really the place for it, but the story pretty happily busies itself with the story of Schwartzman's character in the story trying to have an honest reckoning with himself and his young family, something he's been avoiding for the past few weeks. Eventually an alien shows up (an absolutely perfect moment, a perfect marriage of Anderson's best live action and stop-motion instincts). Around all this, as Anderson movies tend to go, a niche community (well, in this case, two) is explored, although it's not really the point, but how the community(s) reacts to circumstances.
Me, I'd choose, if forced, to interpret the point of Asteroid City to warn against comforting complacency, that in order to make progress you have to challenge yourself. But this isn't possible unless you're first willing to admit your complacency.
At any rate, Hanks and Carell are the signifiers that although this acts and behaves like a typical Anderson movie, it really isn't. He is very obviously trying to make a point. It's very possible this will raise Asteroid City's value for me, later, when I will have more fully digested the results. But it's certainly another excellent effort on his part.
Marlowe (2023) Review
the rating: ****
the story: Private detective Philip Marlowe searches for a dead man.
the review: Some movies get dismissed by critics seemingly without their ever having watched them at all. I assume Marlowe was simply because it was another Liam Neeson movie in the era of Taken, when he's chosen to star in an endless series of movies of that ilk. The other reason would be the pointless crusade of the media to protect Old Hollywood by immediately rejecting anything that could possibly evoke it. Raymond Chandler's Marlowe was of course the character Bogart played in The Big Sleep, one of his Big Three roles alongside The Maltese Falcon and Casablanca.
At its heart Marlowe is of course evoking classic film noire, but not as obviously as, say, the Sin City movies. It isn't shot in black and white, for instance. The storytelling beats are all there. The end of the movie evokes Maltese Falcon, even Raiders of the Lost Ark, making a joke of the whole idea of the maguffin, since the real point was exploring the nasty secrets of Hollywood (apparently no way to make a living making movies these days). Having recently rewatched The Third Man, I couldn't help but think of Marlowe as more that kind of movie, although of course its inversion, since Third Man famously stars Orson Welles, whom we don't see until about the third act, whereas Neeson is obviously the star of Marlowe and its "third man" is another very capable Mexican actor doomed to be ignored by mainstreatm modern Hollywood (hello, Die in a Gunfight!), who just so happens to sound like Brad Pitt. The whole point of casting Neeson in a movie like this is to draw on the Taken mystique, to find Marlowe credible in all his story beats. But Marlowe is otherwise nothing like Taken. In fact, most of Neeson's Taken movies try to find some interesting variation. I remember Unknown finding interesting things. Marlowe has more in common with A Walk Among the Tombstones than Taken. But critics want Neeson to star in another sad Irish epic like Rob Roy or Michael Collins, or Schindler's List. Forget that they ignore stellar work in Silence, A Monster Calls.
The director is the reliable Neil Jordan, the screenwriter William Monohan, neither of whose work deserves such casual dismissal. Neeson has Jessica Lange and Diane Kruger as his dames to kill for, the likes of Danny Huston (born for this role, possibly his best iteration of it, in such a pure state), Alan Cumming, even Colm Meaney, Adawale Akinnuoye-Agbaje (playing the role Dennis Haysbert did in the second Sin City, but a heroic version).
This is a version of classic Hollywood, sure, but the version that was possible to make in 2023. You don't win any points by claiming "they did it better back then." There are so many versions of so many stories told over so many thousands of years, you don't win points by stating, "they did it a hundred years ago." Characters like Marlowe are liable to disappear if they don't resurface every now and then. Eventually no one will care Bogart played him. If he's no longer relevant, it doesn't matter.
This is an excellent way to bring him back around again. If the critics want to contradict themselves and claim there's no point bringing Marlowe back and that it's just another forgettable post-Taken movie for Neeson...It's their loss. For the art of film, this is everyone's gain. A movie I was very pleased to press "play" again when there were things I missed.